Developing recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease: the role of the patient’s perspective in a controversial environment
Pomey, M., Bush, P., Demers-Payette, O., L'Espérance, A., Lochhead, L., Ganache, I., & Roy, D. (2020). Developing recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease: The role of the patient's perspective in a controversial environment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1-6. doi:10.1017/S0266462320002123
The Ministry of Health in Québec requested the National Institute of Excellence in Health and Social Services to produce clinical and implementation recommendations for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment of Lyme disease.
(i) Describe the process of trialing different modalities of patient engagement as a means to integrate a diversity of patient perspectives and (ii) Describe the learning process of INESSS regarding the integration of the patient perspective.
All documents were analyzed, and a survey with all advisory committee members and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders were conducted. Each interview was transcribed verbatim and imported into QDA miner software for the purposes of analysis. Data analysis was carried out concurrently with data collection to allow for an iterative approach between data collection and analysis.
Five methods to integrate the perspectives of patients were used: (i) interviews with patients, (ii) inclusion of patient partners within the advisory committee, (iii) literature review, (iv) focus groups with one patient association, and (v) feedback from patient associations on recommendations intended for decision makers and other targeted stakeholders. The patient partners influenced decisions by sharing their experiential knowledge. The patient interviews and the literature review added an in-depth perspective on the disease and experience with the healthcare system. The patient association members shared their perspectives and helped disseminate the recommendation to sustain a practice change.
The combination of methods to collect and integrate patients’ knowledge and patient associations’ perspectives helped develop a comprehensive understanding of a controversial object of evaluation.
Ce contenu a été mis à jour le 8 janvier 2021 à 11 h 12 min.